Two way dialogue was encouraged between our seafarers and shore based teams on key topics of Safety, Port State control, ship efficiency, Wellness @ Sea (Wallem’s own wellbeing program for. The template of the Statement of Compliance for the fuel oil data report can be found in the. Download SEEMP Part II (Data Collection Plan) Template (word).

Maritime Professional May 2011 Current Trends in MARPOL Enforcement The United States has long been aggressively enforcing compliance with the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, as amended (“MARPOL”), which is implemented in the United States by the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (“APPS”). Since the early 1990s, the effort has been directed at all types of registered and domestic tonnage – the full spectrum of waterborne commerce.

Those entities and individuals prosecuted for MARPOL violations also span a wide spectrum of owners, operators, technical managers, masters, engineers, shoreside personnel and corporate officers. Fated to love you kdrama. MARPOL prosecutions commonly involve bypasses of the oily water separator or discharges of sludge overboard rather than through incineration. Biblioteki dlya bazis mebeljschik 8. Few of these prosecutions involve illegal discharges in U.S. Waters – virtually all involve false entries in the Oil Record Book (“ORB”).

Maintaining an inaccurate ORB while in domestic waters or presenting an inaccurate ORB to the U.S. Coast Guard is a crime and a basis for prosecution, along with post-incident conduct such as obstruction of justice or false statements made to investigators following commencement of the investigation. These efforts are often viewed by the rest of the world as heavy handed, as many believe that enforcement actions for recordkeeping violations with respect to illegal discharges occurring in international waters should be the responsibility of the flag State. The United States government disagrees and has stated unequivocally that it will continue to enforce, even more aggressively, until the illegal discharges stop. The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) recently noted that 88 million gallons of oil are discharged illegally from vessels each year – more than eight times the amount spilled from the Exxon Valdez. Thus, until flag states increase serious enforcement of MARPOL compliance, the United States will likely continue to be the world’s MARPOL cop. Prosecutions continue unabated, with more than a dozen MARPOL cases prosecuted during the last 24 months, as companies fail to learn from the mistakes of others.

And, the prosecutions are now yielding higher penalties, jail time and the banning of ships from United Statesports. As an example of the DOJ’s persistence, Stanships Inc.

And three related companies, collectively the owners and operators of the M/V Americana, pled guilty again, in April of this year (Stanships pled guilty in a prior case in June 2010) to 32 felony counts for violations of APPS, the Ports and Waterways Safety Act and obstruction of justice. The companies will be fined $1 million and prohibited from trading to the United States during the five-year probationary period. The individual owning the companies is also banned from owning ships trading to the United States for five years. A whistleblower’s report to the Coast Guard, including cell phone photographs of the “magic pipe,” kicked off this investigation, which involved illegal discharges of sludge and oily water and the failure to report a hazardous condition prior to a United States port call. In the past, it has been rare to ban ships from trading to the United States and this is the first time an owner has been banned. While whistleblowers have been part of the seascape in APPS prosecutions for years, more than 50% of the new cases stem from whistleblowers, probably because of the lucrative rewards DOJ is requesting and courts are awarding.

This can amount to as much as 50% of any penalty paid for APPS violations. Unfortunately – and because of the reward prospects, whistleblowers often ignore company policies and the ISM Code by reporting wrongdoing directly to the Coast Guard rather than through the chain of command or to the Designated Person Ashore. This serves to undermine international systems in place to deal with potential violations. The maritime industry has had ample notice of the aggressiveness of the enforcement actions and the lucrative awards being given to whistleblowers.

Industry must therefore understand the controlling laws and enforcement mechanisms and take aggressive steps to ensure compliance and reduce enforcement risks. This is particularly important in light of the recent Memorandum of Understanding between the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the U.S. Coast Guard regarding enforcement of EPA’s Vessel General Permit, which includes numerous recordkeeping and other requirements. Developing a Culture of Compliance Many vessel owners and technical managers have become more proactive regarding MARPOL compliance as the pace of enforcement has increased. In some instances, enhanced compliance measures have been imposed by the courts in the United States following a port State MARPOL enforcement action. In other situations, companies have elected proactively to strengthen their compliance regimes, recognizing both the escalating environmental requirements and to minimize the risks of becoming the target of a MARPOL enforcement action.